Disabling DirectWrite in chrome:flags works around the problem.
chrome://flags/#disable-direct-write
Search found 60 matches
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:46 am
- Forum: Known Issues
- Topic: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112436
- Tue Apr 26, 2016 5:13 pm
- Forum: Known Issues
- Topic: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112436
- Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:56 am
- Forum: Known Issues
- Topic: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112436
Re: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
Unfortunately, 14328 doesn't help.
- Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:55 pm
- Forum: Known Issues
- Topic: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112436
Re: Narrow font in 9.0.2.0
Feel free to delete the thread. This turns out to be a Windows 10 problem with build 14316, which coincidentally was installed not long before the Slimjet upgrade. I've subsequently found the problem in Vivaldi and Cent, too. One other user has reported the problem so far that I've seen. It is odd t...
- Wed Apr 06, 2016 2:08 pm
- Forum: Known Issues
- Topic: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112436
Re: Narrow font in 9.0.2.0
No, that's still on 100%.
As a sanity check, I ran Chrome and all looks normal there. This gives you a better look at the problem, with Slimjet on top and Chrome on the bottom:
http://screencast.com/t/mDBmB0x0BpYv
As a sanity check, I ran Chrome and all looks normal there. This gives you a better look at the problem, with Slimjet on top and Chrome on the bottom:
http://screencast.com/t/mDBmB0x0BpYv
- Wed Apr 06, 2016 1:08 pm
- Forum: Known Issues
- Topic: Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112436
Windows 10 build 14316 Narrow font issue
I just updated from 9.0.1.0 to 9.0.2.0 in Win10 and find that seemingly all pages, including internal ones, use a narrow font. I have not changed the font settings (it's still on Medium). Is this just a quirk here? Capture.JPG Problem Identified This turns out to be a Windows 10 problem with build 1...
- Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:08 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Slimjet 32 & 64 Version 5.0.16.0 using old flash?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 20217
Re: Slimjet 32 & 64 Version 5.0.16.0 using old flash?
New version of Flash today so more fun. Testing with 6.0, trying to update with chrome://components yielded no results. Manually updating the Program Files location with v.245 and visiting Adobe's Flash About page showed v.245, despite an older version in the profile and later NO version in the prof...
- Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:49 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Slimjet 32 & 64 Version 5.0.16.0 using old flash?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 20217
Re: Slimjet 32 & 64 Version 5.0.16.0 using old flash?
How long ago was the one in Program Files deprecated? I could have sworn that not too long ago (a month or two at most), I visited the Flash About page and found that Program Files took precedence over the one in the profile. It doesn't now in .16, at least. Why does the installer still put Flash in...
- Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:42 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Slimjet 32 & 64 Version 5.0.16.0 using old flash?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 20217
Re: Slimjet 32 & 64 Version 5.0.16.0 using old flash?
I really wish it wouldn't do that. The installer should be able to sense whether a newer version already exists in Slimjet's program directory, and if so, not overwrite it. I've setup a batch file that I run after updating Slimjet, which is a little ridiculous. It copies the current files in from th...
- Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:47 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Slimjet 6 and Java support
- Replies: 16
- Views: 40221
Re: Slimjet 6 and Java support
Yes, great job for those who need it -- though Flash has taken over from Java this year as the far more prevalent exploit, so either it's not quite the disaster it once was or hackers have moved on.